By Thomas Eldredge
There
was a commercial once where the guy who was captain of the space station on Star Trek: Deep Space Nine said, "I
want my flying cars." He was talking about why we hadn't moved further
technologically than we had at that time. He sounded serious, but it was
because he was being paid to sell credit cards or insurance or something.
I
don't want credit cards, insurance, or flying cars. I'll tell you what I want,
Captain: I want that damn space station.
We
went to the moon before half the people reading this were born. That's right,
folks: believe it or not, we went there. We walked all over that bald,
bucktooth cousin of ours and showed it what city folk can do out in the
country. We figured out that it was cold on one side, hot on the other, and
really dusty.
We
learned in the process. We learned about the universe and surviving in space
and whatnot. We united the human race in purpose for a singular moment in
history. It was a pretty good ride. After about five years, we went back home
for good. That's the story of our farthest manned exploration of the cosmos.
That was nearly 40 years ago.
It
took us about 40 years to get from E = mc2 to Hiroshima. It only took about six years once
we really got started on the bomb. Later that century, it took us about 20
years to go from DOS 3.1 to the Xbox™. During that time of vital development,
we flew the exact same space shuttles. The time from the inception of the
Mercury program to the conclusion of the Apollo program spanned about 15 years;
that's about the same amount of time between our wars in the Middle
East. We can do a lot in a short time if we have the incentive.
The
lessons of history teach us that our efforts are most united by two things: war
and money. The past 40 in particular have taught us that technological advances
come from the same incentives. Since we cannot count on an alien attack, if we
wish to explore space, we must find money in it.
Making
space exploration a public priority isn't an easy sell, because there is little
incentive. It takes a great deal of imagination to think of space exploration
as a benefit to humanity. It doesn't really seem to benefit anybody except the
guy in the spacesuit floating around out there, and he could be out drinking if
it wasn't for the stupid mission.
Space
exploration would be a hard political platform to run on, and as an issue, it's
special-interest at best. Guys in spacesuits who'd rather be drinking don't
even constitute a special-interest group. Politicians have learned to stay away
from space issues as a talking point, because other than the occasional mention
of a mission to Mars, it sounds a little frivolous and kooky.
Furthermore,
anything that is of benefit to humanity as a whole can be seen as a threat to
national security. Politicians focus on running the government, and that takes
money. Politicians spend our money to make more money to be sure we have money
to run the government and make more money…for the economy, of course.
Many
believe that NASA has been a drain on the economy since its first mission. Only
a few, really nerdy people derive any satisfaction from the pursuits of this
agency. The gains from the space program are outweighed by the fact that it
costs us valuable tax dollars that could be better spent on defense contracts,
campaigning, political favors, outright bribes, and other expenses that grease
the wheels of democracy.
NASA
also creates problems, such as the knowledge that huge meteors and comets might
someday destroy human life on earth. This knowledge is counterproductive to
economic growth, because it is a threat to security that cannot be shocked and
awed into submission. These abstract fears are not conducive to the political
process.
Any
political group who worries too much about a cosmic apocalypse might as well
get tinfoil hats and hang out with L. Ron Hubbard's crew. God is in charge of
the apocalypse, and if He wants us to prevent it, He will provide the economic
incentive to do so.
The
Ansari X Prize® was a boon to space exploration, because it gave us
a tangible incentive to think about space: money. Financial incentives were
offered, and we achieved more in space than we could ever have hoped with
socialist ideas of exploration for the benefit of science.
In
2004, SpaceShipOne was launched in
low orbit and claimed victory for all mankind. For this achievement, some rich
guy claimed the $10-million prize. Nearly $100 million was invested in research
towards this goal.
TheVostok 1, piloted by Yuri Gagarin,
completed the same feat in 1961, but Yuri didn't win $10 million, and the
research was done by commies, so it didn't benefit their economy. It took only
43 years for us to find the means to promote space exploration with direct
capitalist incentives.
Science
observes that space and time may be infinite, and so, the universe may contain
infinite means for human survival within it. There is a hidden danger in this
interpretation. To regard the universe itself as an infinite material and
scientific resource simply violates the principles of supply and demand. We
need demand to run the economy, and with an infinite supply of anything, we
lose all demand and the economy crashes.
We
must set limits on ourselves regarding space exploration. If we do not, we may
find ourselves exploring space with no money to spend once we find somewhere
that will take a Visa®.
Commercializing
space travel allows us to pursue spaceborne technologies with a mind towards
concise goals. Goals like getting me that damn space station. Government-funded
research and other socialist abominations can lend themselves to wasteful and
frivolous studies not pursuant to economic goals. Commercial space travel will
allow us to harness the infinite cosmos to sell more expensive vacation
packages and support vast service industries that will fuel our economy.
It
may also provide us raw materials and scientific data, but any available
resource will be properly fought over to establish ownership. These future wars
and conflicts over resources in space will give us new technologies to go
deeper into the universe to seek more and more wealth to fight over.
I
want that space station, and I'd join the Federation or the Alliance or the freaking Empire to get it. I
want that space station because I want to see the universe and hire really
smart people to go study all of it and tell me what it's all about. I think a
space station out in the Gamma Quadrant would be a good start.
I'd
need money to run the space station and hire all those smart people.
Fortunately, a space station is also a great source of revenue from tourism,
commerce, and people paying to not be exposed to the vacuum of space.
To
provide even more economic incentive for space exploration, I present the Gimme
Space Station U Prize. The winner will be the first person to get me that space
station, and the prize will be $50 in MySpaceStation Bucks and a gift
certificate to not be exposed to the vacuum of space.
Click here to discuss this article on our Message Board. This article was originally posted on
August 03, 2007