By Thomas Eldredge
Life,
like breakfast, is best when it begins with an egg. The egg is one of the most
common reproductive formats. Even complex mammalian organisms such as humans
have eggs somewhere, so I’m told. These mammalian eggs are only one part of the
elegantly mysterious equation describing the circle of life, which, in our
world, inevitably results in babies – plump, tender, delicious babies.
Babies,
according to Wikipedia, come from mommies and daddies. These parental entities
created us, and our brothers and sisters, in some ritual learned through years
of difficult homework and chores, which eventually led to a trip to the
hospital. Without going too far into the mechanics of this ritual, with which I
am wholly unfamiliar, there is a singular effect of reproduction that is of
some interest to science, and is, therefore, the subject of this article: life
– specifically, one of the fundamental particles of human life: the stem cell.
Conception
follows copulation, unless contraception captures the chromosomal carriers,
contradicting the circumstances most conducive to creating the commonly
celebrated “bun in the oven.” The climbing ratio of buns to ovens, and the overwhelming increase in
unwed teenage ovens, has influenced government to get involved in the
standardization of oven maintenance and care. The stem cell is the yeast
that makes the buns rise in these ovens, and some time ago, our elected
officials found that this yeast can also be used to make beer – cold, powerful
beer.
Stem
cell research is a field founded by Ernest McCulloch and James Till in the 1960s,
a time during which the biological sciences were considered “trippy” and “out
there.” Stem cells can be found in adult cells and in blastocysts, which are
more commonly known in Star Trek lore
as the troublesome Tribbles.
McCulloch and Till retain plausible deniability of foreknowledge of the trouble
with Tribbles due to the fact that they are Canadian. Though they may not have known it, during their
march towards truth, these clumsy scientists stepped on a crack that continues
to break mothers’ backs to this day.
Stem
cells represent a state of life that is a potential. Embryonic stem cells even
more so, because not only do these cells have the potential to become any kind
of human cell, they have the potential to be American cells. Politicians know
that American cells can eventually become votes.
The
embryonic stem cell has taken root in the ripe soil of American social
hypocrisy. This stem is growing into the trunk of a tree that I think it would
be fun to hang a tire swing from, so real kids can play on it and possibly hurt
themselves, because we constantly neglect them and focus on politics.
The
ethical and political problem with embryonic stem cells is their source. To
even think of gathering these living cells is truly an abhorrent use of the
mind. It forces us to remember that the source exists. So, due to the
detestable nature of the source and its offense to our souls, we ignore its
utility to our bodies, the vessels of our so-often-offended souls.
Whatever
your views on the subject of embryonic stem cell research, that part is not
funny. The distinct unfunnyness of this conundrum results in people getting
really mad at each other and doing a lot of preaching, sometimes in the form of
jaded attempts at satire.
So
here we are again, science on one side, religion on the other. The politicians
are our athletes and champions in the new spectator sport of ethics and
morality, life and death, gross and yucky. We cheer and boo at the arena, and
then go home and live our lives. Daughters get pregnant: some become good
mothers, some poor; some have abortions, some miscarry. Not funny.
It
is all so intensely not funny that we can, at the same time, forgive nearly
anything and forgive so very little. However, most of us just cheer and boo
harder, and our politicians make laws for us so they can keep their jobs. Some
of those laws protect life; most of those laws protect power. Central to all
this turmoil and unfunnyness is a marginally funny fact: The political debate
over stem cells boils down to babies, who cannot vote.
Rigorous
scientific testing and analysis proves that babies eventually turn into us, and
that we were, at one time, babies. We are not babies now, and babies are
clearly not us, so it is our responsibility to see to it that they become us,
or we may disappear, like Marty McFly fading from a causality-defying
photograph from the future.
Babies
have always been a problem in society due to their inherent cuteness and our
irrational desire to protect and care for them at any cost. In prehistory, we paid
the price for their safety in environmental risk, physical suffering, and
mortal peril. Today we pay the price to protect babies by hard work, difficult
choices, and occasionally sacrificing our reason in favor of the specter of
setting a good spiritual example.
If
we accept the utility of embryonic stem cells, then we accept or tolerate the
acts that lead to their most heinous sources, but we already do that. So what
do we do? We take care of babies so that, one day, they can deal with these
ugly choices and not us, because thanks to generations of material success and
assumed moral authority, we are irresponsible and unprepared. Let’s just hope
that, unlike us, our babies eventually get tired of shiny toys and turn their
minds towards more profound thoughts about life. Mmmmm, babies.
Click here to discuss this article on our Message Board. This article was originally posted on
March 07, 2008